Houston, I Think We Have A Problem;
At Least To Me!
By
Jim “Gymbeaux” Brown, April 17, 2018
It is impossible not to get involved in
politics in one form or another in a country currently divided based entirely
upon your political party affiliation.
Never has this become so obvious than having just witnessed what
involved Television/Radio Talk Show Host Sean
Hannity and the ongoing Russia Collusion Investigation.
It may be impossible for people to put
aside their political beliefs to consider what I am suggesting in this Nugget;
I sincerely hope they can. What happened
to Hannity by a Federal Judge COULD
happen to anyone one of us. If it CAN
happen to one, it CAN happen to MANY! http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/sean-hannity-revealed-michael-cohen-mystery-client-article-1.3936561
To my knowledge, Sean Hannity is NOT under any investigation by
anyone. Of course I could be wrong but I
seriously doubt that his name surfaced as a result of the investigation being
conducted by Special Prosecutor Mueller.
If that is the case, explain how Sean Hannity’s privacy can be totally
disregarded by a Federal Judge when that Judge REQUIRES an attorney to provide a list of names of everyone that
the attorney lists as his or her client.
If Sean Hannity did nothing illegal, how can his name be dragged through
the courts mud hole as if he did?
I spent over 33 years in the real estate
business. I cannot remember how many
attorneys I have spoken to over those 33 years; trust me, there were many. Only one was an attorney that I actually paid
legal fees to for services rendered personally to me and that was to create a Will. If any of those attorneys ever found
themselves in a situation such as President Trump’s attorney Michael Cohen found
himself, would they be REQUIRED to
release to the court my name as they
did Sean Hannity’s?
Compare what happened to Hannity with what
has already happened to a great many Americans whose names have been
inadvertently discovered during wire taps of foreign entities. Those names are MASKED by the Federal Government so that no one can have their name
tainted by those conversations most of which contained no illegal
activities. To UNMASK those names requires a special request and until the Obama
Administration such approval of those requests were the exception, not the rule.
“Houston” my question is this. Why do Americans have their names protected
through the “masking” process but those same Americans can have their privacy
exposed through in a Federal Court by a Federal Judge when there was no evidence presented that the
American, Sean Hannity, had done anything illegal? The simple act of releasing a name such as
that of Sean Hannity “suggests” that Hannity had done something wrong or
illegal.
In my opinion, repeat OPINION, the releasing of Hannity’s name was nothing more than
political grandstanding by a Federal Judge.
Think about it without the blinders of a political bias. The judge could
just have easily asked for a list of the attorney’s clients and then based upon
any charges being considered release ONLY
the names of anyone who “might” be involved but even then, that is presuming
that someone is guilty instead of presuming them to be innocent until proven
guilty.
THERE
WAS NO REASON OTHER THAN POLITICAL GRANDSTANDING TO RELEASE SEAN HANNITY’S NAME
OR THE NAME OF ANY OF THE ATTORNEY’S CLIENTS WITHOUT FIRST CHARGING THOSE
CLIENTS WITH COMMITING A CRIME.
DISCLAIMER: I
am NOT a Sean Hannity fan; in fact,
I do not like his television show and have only listened to his radio show a
couple of times. But I know when
something is not right and this frankly stinks.
If you fail to understand that, I pray that what happened to Hannity
never happens to you so that you discover what the power a judge can hold over
you and your family. I am NOT an attorney but I believe the Rule
of Law was just thrown out the window.
No comments:
Post a Comment