Saturday, July 2, 2022




By Jim “Gymbeaux” Brown, July 2, 2022

If the January 6 Un-select Committee has unearthed one undeniable fact, it involves the little-known word “trencherman.”  What does trencherman mean?  So glad you asked.  Meriam Webster describes it as: 

Definition of trencherman

1a hearty eater (and I add the additional definition, “gobbler”)


Enter the January 6 “key witness”, Cassidy Hutchison, who supposedly had “bombshell” revelations regarding the activities of President Trump.  Seems as if even before her testimony was finished, many “facts” she discussed were dispelled by the Secret Service Agents that were actually involved in the incident she described.  Not only did they say Trump’s actions NEVER HAPPENED, they said they were willing to testify UNDER OATH to that effect.

DISCLAIMER:  I have not watched the national or the local news in many, many months.  They only tell you what THEY want you to hear and see.  Often times, in fact most times, their reporting is laced with their personal thoughts, beliefs and innuendos that force you to believe in a certain way, the way THEY want you to believe.  So why watch them?  In this regard, look up Operation Mockingbird to see how YOU and everyone else have been manipulated by none other than our own CIA.

How does the term “trencherman” fit into this Nugget?  I’ve seen the responses of people on main stream news media’s stations who are supposed to be reporters of the news, but instead inject THEIR PERSONAL OPINIONS into their coverage.  I’ve witnessed their obvious jubilance over the negative information about President Trump, true or not; it was sickening.  They became “trenchermen” or as in this case, they gobbled up the information Hutchinson passed along and falsely attributed truth to her comments.  In reality, neither the January 6 Committee NOR the news reporters made any attempts to corroborate her testimony.  Instead, they just puked the same information all over television screens around the country and television viewers became trenchermen by reposting and repeating (puking) the same information to whomever would listen.


HEADLINE LINE NEWS!  BREAKING NEWS!  We’ve seen all the banners to trumpet a news story and since it is “Headline News” or “Breaking News”, it must be “true news” is it not?  We’ve seen the headlines on newspapers and the subsequent storylines.  What we rarely if ever see are the retractions of the “headline news” or “breaking news” or newspaper headlines and stories.  At least the newspapers tend to publish retractions but they bury them in the obituary section of the paper which I would guess, represents just how dead the initial story line was when first printed.  Television “reporters” rarely if ever announce they made a mistake and apologize for their error in reporting – they just don’t do it.  They believe that the television audience has a very limited retention span and will not remember the false story lines broadcast on their stations.  Sadly, they are probably correct, we don’t!

Reporters (I am reluctant to call them that) reminded me of the images you see in movies of people given their freedom from captivation from unscrupulous and violent prisoner of war guards who used starvation as one technique to break prisoners.  They are ravenous, hadn’t eaten food in days if not weeks.  They lost weight and their bodies showed the effect of going without food.  Then when the calvary arrives and frees them, they are given food and they can’t eat it fast enough (hearty eater – trenchermen).  The news media has been starved of any and all news relating to President Trump ever since he left office.  They may not physically appear to be emaciated but they are – they haven’t had anything to talk about (eat) to increase their ratings since Trump left office over 18 months ago.  One could say that President Trump for over 5 years had become their life-saving vitamin supplements and now they have been deprived of those supplements and their news coverage, their ratings and their obvious desire NOT to cover what was actually happening in America is more than obvious.  Their politically biased fa├žade comes through LOUD AND CLEAR throughout their broadcasts!

In an instant, just like the liberators at prison camps, Cassidy Hutchinson provided the news media with an onslaught of Trump Food or Trump Supplements through her testimony.  Instead of testing the food (her testimony) to see if it was rancid or filled with poison, like starving prisoners of war, they gobbled down the pablum like it was the last bit of morsels on the plant.  They ate the poison, one and all!  The fact that almost every major news outlet reproduced Hutchinson’s testimony WITH BIASED COMMENTS, demonstrated to me that there is one hand, or just a few hands, guiding the news coverage in America.  Otherwise, how can you explain that they all used the EXACT SAME WORDS AND PHRASES on their news broadcasts, both national AND local, in spite of being on competing networks?  YOU CAN’T!

When I first saw some of what Hutchinson said, HUGE RED FLAGS appeared to me but not so much to the reporters who not only repeated (puked) what she said, they added their comments (their vomit) to the storyline.  They were gleeful that they had finally caught President Trump in performing acts that would lead to his inability to ever run for office again.  Our Democracy was somehow saved by Hutchinson’s testimony and they all declared such.  I immediately came to the conclusion that Hutchinson was a plant.  Was she planted by members of the January 6 Committee to advance their cause?  That’s a definite possibility.  Why did I assume this?  Because her testimony was, at least to me, so unbelievable.  She was visibly NOT a credible witness nor was she audibly a credible witness, at least to me.  I felt that the only way someone like Hutchinson would be in front of the Committee would be if someone like the Committee, intentionally placed her there.  My initial reaction was who gained the most by doing such a backhanded and probably illegal thing?  Again, my first reaction was The Committee because it advanced THEIR agenda to destroy President Trump.

But wait…there is someone else who could benefit from such a plant when the testimony of the plant became so quickly evident that it was false.  Who might benefit the demise of the January 6 Committee?  None other than President Trump. Could the Trump Team have placed Hutchinson in front of the Committee?   In the end, it really doesn’t matter who benefited the most because her testimony contained so many obvious lies that (1) the Committee lost all credibility because they did not properly vet her claims and (2) President Trump because Hutchinson’s testimony may lead to the total demise of the Committee through their own failed actions. The only real winner would then become the American people.

The Television audience ratings are dismal and the Committee knows it.  They may have thought by putting Hutchinson at the witness table they would increase their viewership and thus their ratings and hopefully get more of the American public on their side.  If the agenda of the Committee was to get to the truth of what happened on January 6, they would welcome such a testimony AND they would have vetted her claims by interviewing members of the Secret Service which they did not!  They too became “trenchermen” of sorts by gobbling up her comments like food to starving prisoners of war.  In this case the food they ate WAS laced with poison just like the food the main stream news reporters gobbled up and then puked out over the airwaves.

If there is one word that comes to MY mind that best describes what the January 6 Committee is doing, it would be POLITICS.  If you dissect the word POLITICS, you first get “poli”  meaning “many” and “tics” meaning bloodsucking insects.  We should change the spelling so the word better describes the political environment in Washington, DC that is comprised of hundreds if not thousands of “bloodsucking tics” to:


The January 6 Committee consists of mostly Democrats and only TWO so-called Republicans (RINOs) (one is on his way out through retirement, the other probably through a lost re-election attempt in November 2022), both are very publicly opposed to just about everything related to President Trump.  The Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, REFUSED to permit the Minority Leader’s right to place whomever he wanted to serve on the Committee which violated the House of Representatives own written rules.  Thus, the term the January 6 “un-select” Committee devolved to describe the Committee as being “unselect” and its continued operations illegal.  Any resemblance of TRUTH that the January 6 Unselect Committee discovers is purely an accident.

Permission to use a Golf Analogy?  The golf tournament announcers pointed out that the pin was placed only 6 paces from the right edge of the green and adjacent to a very deep bunker.  If any golfer’s shot landed between the pin and the edge of the green and sand bunker, IT WOULD BE A MIS-HIT, OR AN ACCIDENTENTIAL SHOT.  This is how I would ask that you understand the pure disgust regarding the Unselect Committee’s actions and the main stream media’s news coverage of it.  Any truths they claim or uncover are more by accident than by intent or design and more importantly would be few and very far between!

Believe what YOU want to believe.  I, on the other hand, am confident in my belief that Hutchinson’s testimony was fraudulent.  I would like to know (1) who placed her in this position, and (2) why would anyone immediately believe what she testified to no matter how outrageous it first appears WITHOUT any verification/validation?  If you are watching these hearings or getting the results of the hearing on any of the national news outlets, you are being intentionally misled and frankly that makes you a “useful idiot” as defined by none other than Vladmir Lenin.  You are being used to advance a cause (usually political) without you even being aware that you are doing so, and is contrary to what you might otherwise believe to be good judgement.  That my friend is how the Communists operate and how you become THEIR USEFUL TOOLS!  CONGRATULATIONS!

Monday, June 27, 2022

A Word To The Wise (may not be enough)




By Jim “Gymbeaux” Brown, June 27, 2022


So you know, the average size of a fuel tank on a “big rig” is between 120 gallons and 150 gallons AND there are TWO such tanks on most trucks.  This is a fact!

On June 13, 2022, the average cost of a gallon of diesel fuel is $5.718 and it will continue to increase.  This is a fact!

Since the size of tanks vary from 120 to 150 and that there are two such tanks, that means that the trucks you see on the streets carry between 240 and 300 gallons of fuel in EACH big truck.

You can do the math but I have already done it for you.  Let’s say that on average these trucks carry 270 gallons of diesel fuel costing $5.718 a gallon.  That means that when they fill up their tanks, the total cost of the fuel within those tanks is $1,543.86.

The average cost of diesel fuel in January 2020 was $3.064.  Using the same numbers, that equals $827.28 of fuel when the tanks are topped off.,the%20same%20week%20last%20year.

What is the difference?  $1,542.86 minus $827.28 equals a difference of $715.58 INCREASE IN A TRUCKER’S COST to deliver the same amount of goods in 2022 than it did in 2020.  And as the statement below indicates, many if not most of the trucks you see on the highways are independently owned and operated.  The cost of fuel IS driving these “small businesses” out of business!  This link confirms this and provides a lot more information than you probably want to know or even understand.

For the average “Joe” on the street, and that includes you, who goes shopping, the last thing on Joe’s mind is the cost of diesel fuel.  He is more interested in the cost of milk, bread, eggs, formula, breakfast cereal, meat, paper products, etc.  With that in mind, I want to repeat a note I received from a friend.  There were no references on the note, only the following comment.  Therefore, I did my own research which is posted above this paragraph to verify what the following statement indicates.  I didn’t doubt the comment, I simply wanted to include actual references to the costs referred to. Read it for yourself and then YOU decide if you should be stocking up on non-perishable food products and water.  The note:

I need to get something off my chest… I generally refrain from talking politics, and especially making political posts, however I need to say this. 

What I’m going to post is real, not somebody that a friend’s, cousin’s, sister’s, neighbor has happening to them… 

I own a small trucking company, and this is what the fuel crisis is doing to our country… so this directly affects me, you, our children, our country. 

Today I filled up my truck to deliver products that help keep our country fed. When I filled up my truck, it cost me $1,149.50. This is ONE truck, for ONE day of fuel. I own three. So for one day of operation, it’s costing me $3,448.50. (Yes, we use a full tank of fuel every single day, sometimes more than 1 tank per day) 

My trucks generally run 5-6 days a week, so we’ll just estimate on the low side and say 5. That’s $17,242.50. Last week was over $20k for ONE week, that I have to pay out of my pocket to try and keep not only my children fed, but those of my employees, and our country. 

Mark my words, we are on a downhill slide to the worst recession our country has ever seen. If you don’t believe me, I implore you to do your research. 

Trucking companies are going under left and right. (Literally hundreds weekly) If you’re not aware, what you’re wearing, what you’re eating, what you’re living in, what you’re driving, what you’re reading this on, was delivered by a truck. 

If something drastic doesn’t change in the next few weeks/months, I promise you, you’ll see empty shelves everywhere you look. You’ll see chaos as people fight for the basic necessities of everyday life. Food, medicine, etc... 

If something doesn’t change, I pray that all of you have the ability, knowledge, and skills to fend for yourselves. Not only against those who would do you or your family harm, but to be able to find sustainable food and water. 

This is a scary time. Not only for small business owners, but every single American. 

So please, please do your research when we vote for those we place in power. This isn’t just on the federal level, but on the state levels as well. We have got to start making informed decision based on fact. Not because the media says we should like/dislike somebody. 

Truck drivers are out here going for broke, holding onto something we know this country needs. 

So if you know a truck driver, please tell them to hold on as long as they can. Our country won’t survive without them…

As you can see, the ACTUAL numbers for June 13, 2022 are even worse than what this truck owner indicated in his statement.  I have read numerous articles from many different authors and sources and they all have suggested that we should be stocking up on non-perishable food products and I would suggest gasoline as well.  The cost of getting these products to the store shelves is ever increasing and there does not appear to be a solution (end) coming any time soon.  There will be food shortages, how prepared are you?  I can recall the 4 weeks following Hurricane Katrina when it was impossible to buy anything because of the lack of deliveries, the lack of power, the lack of just about everything.  Don’t be so quick to rule out the loss of power because we have already been warned that there could be rolling blackouts as a distinct possibility.  When you have no power, it is almost impossible to buy anything that uses electricity to check you out at a computer/register.  Nor can you retrieve any money from an ATM machine that also works on electricity.  Therefore, in addition to non-perishable food products and extra gasoline, I would recommend that you also having cash available in small bills.  Why small bills?  You don’t want a shop owner telling you that he or she cannot break a $100 bill for you which will happen, I know this because of what followed Hurricane Katrina. 

A word to the wise “should” be sufficient.  Or as Benjamin Franklin REALLY said: 

A word to the wise is enough, and many words won't fill a bushel.