Useless Eaters

 

USELESS EATERS
By Jim “Gymbeaux” Brown, 22 October 2025

It was not that many years ago when I had never heard of the phrase “useless eaters.”  When I read about it, I could easily see how people might have developed it and then regrettably used it to justify their goals regardless of how nefarious those goals might have been.  If you look the term up, you will discover the following:

The term “useless eaters” (German: “unnütze Esser”) originates from Nazi Germany during the 1930s and 1940s.

Historical Origin

The phrase was used by the Nazi regime to describe people whom THEY (the regime) considered unproductive or burdensome to society, particularly those who could not contribute to the war effort or economy. This included:

• People with physical or mental disabilities
• The elderly
• The chronically ill
• Others deemed “unfit” by the state

Connection to Nazi Policy

The term became especially notorious in connection with the T4 Euthanasia Program (1939–1941), in which the Nazis systematically murdered more than 200,000 disabled and institutionalized people. Nazi propaganda portrayed these victims as “useless eaters” draining resources that could otherwise support the German military or “healthy” population.

Broader Meaning

Since World War II, “useless eaters” has been used critically or metaphorically to describe any ideology or system that devalues human life based on productivity or perceived worth. It’s often invoked in discussions about:

• Eugenics (look up Margaret Sanger (with her sister Ethel Byrne and activist Fania Mindell
• Totalitarian control
• Dehumanization in political rhetoric (in 2025, a great many Americans have stated through polling that it is acceptable to murder politicians who represent policies contrary to the person being polled.  How is that even a possibility of being acceptable?)

Why have I thought about the term of late?  So glad you asked.  I turned 81 this year.  R The elderly.  I have several underlying medical/health conditions R Physical and Mental Conditions.  My health issues will not get any better, only worse; equals being  R Chronically Ill.  Prior to turning 81, I had a very successful 20-year Coast Guard career.  I followed that with a successful 33-year career in real estate sales, brokerage and training.  For well over 50 years, I was a producer within the American society.  Now? Not so much!

What all that means is that I am physically unable to work and have only my military retirement, Social Security Pension and one small stable income from my real estate career.  Whereas before I didn’t know what “useless eaters” meant, now I R one, as the old joke states.

Why is this important, after all, we are not 1930s Germany, we are the United States of America and we are part of the team that defeated Nazi Germany.  Could this happen in America?

You MUST consider several aspects to this subject.  First, how many children on average must a family have to maintain (neither grow or decline) its civilization?  According to ChatGPT, when asked, said the following: 

To maintain a civilization without immigration, a family (on average) must have just over two children per woman—2.1 is the magic number. Fewer than that for long periods, and the civilization will eventually fade demographically.  As a side note, you might want to pay particular attention to the word “woman” in this answer which disputes many who now believe that men can become pregnant.  ChatGPT further states that:  In the United States, the average number of children born per woman (the total fertility rate, or TFR) has fallen to about 1.6 children in recent years.

Therefore, by definition, the American population is declining at an alarming rate.  Part of this decline is the result of abortions conducted in America.  How many you might ask?  According to the Guttmacher Institute, there were about 1,038,000 clinician-provided abortions in U.S. states without total bans in 2024.  For 2023, Guttmacher estimates 1,037,000 abortions in the formal healthcare system.

The Social Security System was never designed to provide a full retirement system for retirees yet that is exactly how many Americans have perceived it to be.  For decades, workers have contributed to the Security System believing that it will always be available to them during their retirement years.  If you fully understand why I included the paragraphs about the decline in birth rates coupled with abortions, you begin to understand that fewer and fewer people are contributing to the Social Security Fund while at the same time more and more people are reaching the age where they begin to withdraw from the government controlled Social Security Account.  While more people are withdrawing from their entitled benefit, the U. S. Government is using money from the Social Security Account for its own purposes to fill in shortages of income from taxes and fees.  This makes the Social Security System unsustainable if nothing changes.

This is where the term “useless eaters” enters the equation.  There are only two ways to salvage the Social Security System.  Find an influx of money into the account and/or reduce the number of ELIGIBLE people that draw from the account.  I emboldened the word ELIGIBLE because it is a very important concept.  People who did not contribute to the account either because they did not work or they are illegal immigrants, should not be eligible to withdraw from the account.  Yet we know that illegals have come to America with the understanding that they will be provided funds from the Social Security System and they have, contrary to what a great many in the media and politics will admit to.

I have heard no one make the connection between what happened in 2020 with the introduction of COVID to our population yet it is impossible not to at least consider that the COVID disease may have in part been created to reduce the population of seniors. What does ChatGPT have to say about the average age of the deaths from COVID?  Again, so glad you asked:

The CDC’s “Provisional COVID-19 Death Counts by Sex and Age” publishes deaths involving COVID-19 by age group. Data.CDC.gov+2CDC+2

For older adults (65 years and over): in 2020 the death rate per 100,000 was roughly:

·         Ages 65-74: 234.3 per 100,000 CDC

·         Ages 75-84: 589.8 per 100,000 CDC

·         Ages 85+: 1,645.0 per 100,000 CDC

The vast majority of deaths have been among older age groups; younger age groups have far lower death rates.  If COVID didn’t adversely affect you, the vaccine and its lingering effects may have.  Either way, your health was at serious risk the older you were when you were exposed to either the disease or the vaccine.

Is it just a coincidence that the death rates dramatically increased the older a person was who contracted the disease?  Maybe so, maybe not!  It was LeRoy Jethro Gibbs of NCIS fame who coined Rule #39:  There is no such thing as a coincidence!  A lot of people over the age of 65 might be considered in the “useless eater” category and applied it exactly as World War Germany did.  Reduce the number of people who take from the government and reduce the cost of government!  What that just a coincidence?

If you have ever read Agenda 21 and Agenda 30 (the only difference is that Agenda 30 updated the contents of Agenda 21) you will understand that the United Nations, the originator of both Agendas, put it in writing that the world population needed to be reduced by BILLIONS of people (the useless eaters of the world).  They put it in writing.  They also engraved it on the head stone of the Georgia Guide Stones which has since been destroyed; I wonder why?

If you take the time to connect all of the dots, it is almost impossible not to come to the conclusion that the powers that be, covertly attempted to reduce the world’s population through COVID.  Engaging the world in World War Three failed to materialize which is another way of reducing the world’s population but that usually results in much younger people dying whereas COVID attacked the weakened immune systems of more senior adults.

If it walks AND quacks like a Duck;

 IT MUST BE A DUCK!