DID YOU HEAR ABOUT IT?
DID YOU SEE IT?
DID YOU READ ABOUT IT?
Written by Jim “Gymbeaux” Brown, February 6,
2020
There was a day, past tense, where
I had a morning routine. When I first
woke up and got past the hygiene duties, I would then check my emails (took
only a few minutes) and then I would read something positive to start my day on
a positive note. Then along came Social
Media. I added checking Social Media,
primarily Facebook, Linkedin and Twitter right after I checked my emails. I don’t know how much time I spent doing
these four things but I can assure you it was far more than either
deserved. What I have since discovered
is that between Facebook and Twitter there is far more negative posts than
positive posts and yes some of those negative posts have been from yours
truly. Linkedin was more of a business
orientated site and therefore the entries were neutral to positive in nature.
One of my favorite
authors/trainers is Jeffrey Gitomer
and Gitomer suggests that we all resign our position of Chief Executive Officer
of World Matters and concentrate/focus on the things that do matter most to us.
Something we can actually do something
about. What a novel idea. I recently finished reading QBQ! The
Question Behind the Question written by John
G. Miller (for the third or fourth time) and again I was reminded about
how important it is that we ask questions of ourselves to insure we are on the
right track to success, achieving our goals and hopefully happiness.
What does all that mean? Thought you would never ask. To me it means I have been spending way too
much time on things that are best labeled as non-important or even better as
non-important-there-is-nothing-I-can-do-about-them-so-forget-about-even-looking-or-listening-to-them
status.
As a test I suggest watching the
local news for 30 minutes. It typically
consists of news, weather and sports.
You can eliminate one of them by putting your head out the window or
just looking up today’s weather on the Internet. News?
It is usually very negative. If it
bleeds, it leads! Do you really need to
listen to negative bleeding news stories?
As for sports, you can program your phone to send you a message with the
latest scores for your favorite teams.
You have just eliminated a need to watch even the local news. On a typical New Orleans area evening news,
you will see the 45th update on the collapse clean up of the Hard
Rock Hotel, a couple of more people shot or murdered, numerous car break-ins
and an occasional story you may not have heard.
Two segments on the weather and then news about the local sports teams
and virtually nothing on national sporting news. It is the same things, night after
night. What can you do about any of
it? Nothing!
National news is a different kind
of animal. You can deny it or not; if
you actually listen to the words the National News Media uses in its reports,
you can quickly pick out the words and phrases used to lead you in a certain
direction in regards to your thinking and even your beliefs. Making matters worse, most of the major news
sources are owned by a very small number of people. If the direction of the news comes from its
owners it would then be understandable as to how it could have a bias in one
direction or another. It can also cost a
great deal of money to put on a national news show and that means
advertisers. If YOU were
advertising on any television show, not just news shows, you as well would have
certain beliefs you would prefer to support or not support. Therefore, the news content has a strong input
by ownership and advertisers before it is even broadcast. A great many news stories contain false
information that appears to be true just like a lot of Social Media has posts
that appear to be real news but again are false.
Let’s say you are not aware of
some news story that may or may not be important to you. Don’t you think that a member of your family
or a friend or a social media post will ask you, did you hear about it? Did you see it on TV? Did you read about it? Just look around and watch the number of
smart phones being flashed in people’s faces to make sure they have seen, heard
or read about something important.
The next time you watch a national
news program, instead of just mindlessly sitting and watching, actually listen
to the words used and you decide if the words were specifically used to draw a
conclusion from you or lead you in a direction you may not have gone on your
own. Something as mundane as voice fluctuation
can cause you to think in a certain way or change the meaning of a simple
sentence. Want proof. Read the following sentence over and over
again but put voice emphasis on the word emboldened and see how it changes the
meaning of the sentence.
I did not say I beat my wife. I didn’t say it but someone else may have.
I DID not say I beat my wife. It was something I actually DID but then
qualified it.
I did NOT say I beat my wife. I simply said no such
thing
I did not SAY I beat my wife. I did not say it but I may have implied it
I did not say I beat my wife. I did not say it was me who beat my wife,
could have been Joe
I did not say I BEAT my wife. It was not a beating, maybe a little roughing
up
I did not say I beat MY wife. It was not my wife who I beat, I beat the
neighbor’s wife
I did not say I beat my WIFE. It was not my wife, it
was actually my dog I beat.
I have found that political
discussions are far and away the worse.
A reporter will ask a question of a politician and the politician will
provide an answer. Often the answers do
not fit the question. The problem occurs
when the reporter rarely challenges the politician to explain their position
further or asks follow up questions to get to the truth. As such if you tend to believe what you hear,
you may in fact be hearing a false narrative that goes unchallenged by the
reporters. You are then left with a very
one-sided and often times false news story.
So, you watch the news, first
thing in the morning, maybe during lunch and then again at supper. But the worse news cast is the late-night
news. Think about it because that is
what your brain will be doing when you think it is trying to sleep. You get one more bite at the late-night NEGATIVE
news just before closing your eyes thinking you are going to get a good night’s
sleep. WRONG! It just doesn’t work like that. Unless you practice, you cannot turn your
brain off and on with the snap of your fingers.
You have just fed your brain negative information. How will your brain process that information?
Challenge #1: Go for just one day without turning on any
news program – NONE! At the end
of the day, assess how you feel. Do you
feel like you are experiencing anxiety or withdrawals? Do you think you missed out on something
important? What will you do tomorrow
morning whether you watched today’s news or not? Most people think they “need to know” the
news because it is important? Is
it? It may be important to someone but
is it important enough to you for you to take some sort of action? I seriously doubt it. Will you change some
activity that you normally engage in because of something you heard on the
news? Again, I seriously doubt it. If you smoke, have you not heard “news
stories” on the hazards of smoking? But
you smoke anyway. If you hear how bad
sugar can be for your health do you reduce your sugar intake accordingly? Do you reduce the sugar intake for your
children? Again, you may at first but
will you continue on that path because it is the right thing to do or will you
revert to what you did before you heard the newscast?
Challenge #2: Learn to read. I don’t mean teach yourself how to read words
or a group of words, I mean really teach yourself the value of reading. Here is an original quote from yours
truly. You can read for a CHANGE
or your can READ for a change. If
you think about that you will get the humor in that one sentence. Most people in spite of what they will tell
you, just don’t read books anymore and haven’t since they left high school –
studies have proven this. 5% or fewer
Americans read just one book a year.
That means 95% do not read any books in a year. Which group do you fall into? When I say “learn to read” I am suggesting
you do something to insure you are in the 5% not the 95%. Set a goal to read. I suggest you read at least one book a month;
twelve books a year. If you spent just
30 minutes NOT watching one newscast and spent the time reading, you
will have read for 3.5 hours a week.
Most books can be read in 7 to 8 hours.
If that is true, reading just 30 minutes a day would equate to reading 2
books a month or 24 books a year. If you
are selective in your reading, you could improve upon your career, whatever
that is or you can begin setting yourself up for a different career provided
you read books related to the career you desire. As an example, if you were in sales as I once
was, can you see where you could and would improve your ability to sell and
understand people by reading 24 books a year all relating to sales and self-improvement?
Challenge #3: Imagine you are years into your
retirement. You are mentally reviewing
your life thus far. Would you be wishing
that if only you had watched more television?
Or, would wish if only you read more books regarding your profession? I have read over 1200 books and I didn’t
start reading until I was age 44. When
it comes to my education, I feel that I have wasted a good portion of that time
until I turned 44. At the risk of
sounding very immodest, I consider myself to be a very good manager and
trainer. Was I the best? Not even close to the best but I was constantly
getting better every day that I read. Compare that to being stagnant on the
days I didn’t. You are either advancing
to your life’s BIG goal or you are
actually falling behind. In which
direction are you going? Are you sure?
Challenge #4: WRITE!
Does your family know what you do and what you have done that you would
want them to know? Will your grand
children and great grand children and their children ever know what you did or
have done? It’s your legacy. Don’t you want future members of your family
to know your successes and ambitions?
Leave a written legacy; you won’t regret it!
I write these Nuggets for the
Noggin because of my life’s mission statement/goal: To help people do what they do, to do it
better! I then use Joe Tye’s Direction-Deflection-Question
(DDQ) by asking, “Is what I’m about to say, do or write, consistent with my
desire to help people do what they do to do it better?” If yes, I say, do or write it. If no, I don’t! This Nugget was written to help people do
what they do to do it better. If it
helps just one person, I have won the day but not the war.
Here's my email: JimBrown@gymbeaux.com. If you read one book more than you otherwise
would have because of this Nugget, please email me the title and maybe even a
short book review for my benefit. I use
my blog, www.NuggetsfortheNoggin.com
to post book reviews on the books I have read as well as Nuggets such as this
one. I will certainly credit any review
you write for having written it providing you give me permission to post it on
my Blog.
ps If you were to watch 60 minutes less news and
use the time to read, that is about one book a week or 52 books a year. You would definitely be an expert in your
field, light years ahead of your competition.
No comments:
Post a Comment